Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Cp 2 ZrCl(μ-1,4-diphenylbutenyne)PX 2 complexes 7a [−P(C 6 H 5 ) 2 ] and 10 [−P(C 6 F 5 ) 2 ] insert tert -butylisonitrile into the Zr−C(sp 2 ) σ bond to yield the N-inside η 2 -iminoacyl zirconocene complexes 13a and 13b . X-ray crystal structure analysis of complexes 13a and 13b revealed the presence of a chiral atropisomeric structure with a torsion angle of 74.8(2)° ( 13a ) and 72.9(6)° ( 13b ), respectively, around the central iminoacyl/alkenyl C(sp 2 )−C(sp 2 ) σ bond. In solution an analogous chiral structure is observed. The barrier of interconversion of the enantiomeric atropisomers of 13a and 13b was determined at Δ G ⧧ (327K) = 14.9 ± 0.3 kcal mol -1 ( 13a ) and Δ G ⧧ (325K) = 14.8 ± 0.3 kcal mol -1 ( 13b ) by temperature-dependent dynamic NMR spectroscopy. Reaction of 7a and 10 with methyllithium followed by treatment with B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 gave the corresponding cationic zirconocene complexes 12a and 12b . These complexes took up 2 mol equiv of tert -butylisonitrile to yield the cationic N-inside η 2 -iminoacyl zirconocene systems 14a and 14b as isonitrile adducts. The cationic complexes 14a and 14b are also axially chiral. The barriers of enantiomerization (Δ G ⧧ (288 K) = 13.1 ± 0.3 kcal mol -1 ( 14a ), Δ G ⧧ (293 K) = 13.4 ± 0.3 kcal mol -1 ( 14b )) were also determined by dynamic NMR spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spies et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: