Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An economic evaluation regarding the industrial photosynthesis of fine chemical rose oxide using solar light is given and compared to conventional lamps as light source. A plant reaching a capacity of 100 t/a was designed containing app. 1,900 m2 of parabolic troughs, 1,500 m2 of flatbed reactors or 32 high-pressure mercury lamps doped with Thallium iodide (TlI) as a photounit. The investment and production costs were compared and graded. We reached the conclusion that solar application is more profitable than the lamp driven one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monnerie et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: