Key result
The radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) was at least as sensitive as ELISA and immunoblotting for detecting ASFV antibodies, identifying 1 positive serum missed by immunoblot.
Why the study?
Does a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) improve the detection of antibodies to African swine fever virus compared to immunoblotting and ELISA in pig sera?
Observational (n=207)
Yes
Does a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) improve the detection of antibodies to African swine fever virus compared to immunoblotting and ELISA in pig sera?
RIPA is a sensitive and specific confirmatory assay for detecting antibodies to African swine fever virus, performing comparably to or better than immunoblotting and ELISA.
RIPA may enhance ASFV serodiagnosis in swine; this Level 5 animal study leaves open routine adoption pending validation.
A radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) has been developed for detection of antibody to African swine fever virus (ASFV) and compared with the immunoblot assay with regard to sensitivity and specificity. Two hundred seven field sera, obtained from pigs in Spain from different geographic areas between 1975 and 1986, that were positive by ASFV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were also analysed by immunoblot assay and RIPA. By serum dilution experiments, the RIPA appeared at least as sensitive as the ELISA and immunoblotting tests, although ELISA and RIPA detected antibodies to ASFV earlier in natural infection than did the immunoblot assay, as disclosed by animal inoculation studies. The most antigenic ASFV-induced proteins in natural infection detected by RIPA were the viral proteins p243, p172, p73, p25.5, p15, and p12 and the infection proteins p30 and p23.5. In the immunoblot assay, the proteins that were most reactive with the same sera were the viral protein p25.5 and the infection proteins p30, p25, and p21.5. Only 1 serum, from an animal infected with ASFV, was negative by immunoblot assay but showed a positive result by RIPA. A modification of conventional RIPA was performed using a dot transference of immunoprecipitated proteins to a nitrocellulose filter. This modification simplified the conventional RIPA procedures by eliminating the electrophoresis of immunoprecipitated proteins without affecting sensitivity and specificity. The ease of use, specificity, and the sensitivity comparable to that of the immunoblot assay make the RIPA a useful confirmatory assay for sera that yield conflicting results in other ASFV antibody assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alcaraz et al. (1990) conducted an observational in African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection (n=207). Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) vs. Immunoblot assay and ELISA was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detection of antibody to ASFV. The radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) was at least as sensitive as ELISA and immunoblotting for detecting ASFV antibodies, identifying 1 positive serum missed by immunoblot.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: