Authors
PURPOSE: We investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of relative flow volume (RFV), a novel index of blood flow in the human retina derived from laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG). METHODS: Pre- and postbranch retinal RFV measurements were compared in 34 retinal venous bifurcations in 34 healthy volunteers (mean age, 49.0 ± 14.8 years) to determine the accuracy of RFV. Next, the coefficient of variation (COV) of RFV was determined for 30 temporal retinal arteries in a second group of 18 healthy volunteers (mean age, 30.3 ± 7.7 years). Finally, laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) data were obtained from the same study population and compared to RFV data from the retinal vessels. RESULTS: A comparison of RFV measurements in a trunk vessel of the retina and the sum of its two daughter vessels revealed a strong correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). Reproducibility analysis showed that the COV for RFV was 5.9% ± 3.6%. Linear regression analysis revealed that RFV was correlated significantly with LDV measurements of mean retinal blood velocity (vmean) and retinal blood flow (FLDV, vmean, r = 0.61, P < 0.001; FLDV, r = 0.51, P = 0.004, respectively), but not significantly correlated with ocular perfusion pressure (r = -0.04, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that RFV values obtained with LSFG can be considered an accurate and reliable index of relative blood flow in the human retina. Thus, RFV, a novel LSFG-derived variable, has potential for assessing retinal blood flow alterations in ocular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiga et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: