HYPOTHESIS: Trends in serum albumin concentration over time provide a better prediction of clinical outcome in CAPD patients than a single mean value. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of outcome at 36 months in 225 adult CAPD patients. Mean serum albumin was determined for the first (SA1) and second (SA2) 6 months of treatment and patients grouped according to SA1 (group I, > 37; group II, 34-37; group III, < 34 g/l) and according to the change in serum albumin (delta SA) between the first and second 6 months (increased/static or decreased). Patient (PS) and technique (TS) survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The effect of SA1 and delta SA on survival were determined in a multivariate Cox regression analysis model that included age and presence or absence of a systemic disease. RESULTS: By SA1 group, PS and TS survival at 36 months were 94 and 76% (group I), 64 and 53% (group II) and 70 and 52% (group III). If delta SA increased/remained static, then SA1 did not predict PS (group I, 100%; group II, 96%; group III, 74%; P = n.s.) or TS (group I, 72%; group II, 63%; group III, 65%; P = n.s.). If delta SA decreased, PS was worse in groups II and III, both as compared to group I (PS group I, 88%; group II, 52%; group III, 34%; P = 0.02) and as compared to the groups II and III when delta SA increased (PS group II, 74 vs 52%, P = 0.05; group III, 82 vs 34%, P = 0.005) The same trend was seen for TS. In the multivariate Cox regression model, age, direction of change in serum albumin, and presence of a multisystem disease were significant predictors of survival, whereas SA1 was not. CONCLUSION: Early hypoalbuminaemia in CAPD only predicts a worse patient and technique survival if mean serum albumin decreases further from the first to second 6 months of dialysis therapy. Change in serum albumin between the first and second 6 months of CAPD and the mean serum albumin over the first 6 months together offer better discrimination of outcome than either alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: