Key result
DPPE plus doxorubicin was statistically superior to doxorubicin alone for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.91; P=0.021).
Why the study?
Does tesmilifene plus doxorubicin improve outcomes compared to doxorubicin alone in anthracycline-naive women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer?
RCT
randomly assigned
Yes
Does tesmilifene plus doxorubicin improve outcomes compared to doxorubicin alone in anthracycline-naive women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer?
The addition of tesmilifene to doxorubicin significantly improved overall survival in women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer, despite no improvement in progression-free survival or response rate.
Supports DPPE addition to doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer; extends RCT evidence to overall survival despite unchanged PFS.
PURPOSE: N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is a novel agent that augments chemotherapy cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. A phase II trial combining DPPE and doxorubicin (DOX) in metastatic breast carcinoma showed increased response over that expected with DOX. We report a phase III trial comparing DOX with DPPE plus DOX in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anthracycline-naive women with measurable metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive, every 21 days, either DOX 60 mg/m(2) intravenously or DOX during the last 20 minutes of an 80-minute infusion of DPPE (5.3 mg/kg), in both cases to cumulative DOX doses of 450 mg/m(2). Patients receiving DPPE were aggressively premedicated to ameliorate toxicity. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and response duration (RD), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A planned interim analysis failed to detect an RR difference more than 5%. The study was closed to additional accrual and all DPPE was discontinued. The final analysis was conducted as planned after 256 progression events (median follow-up, 20.5 months). There was no significant difference in RR, RD, or PFS between arms. DPPE plus DOX was statistically superior to DOX in OS (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P =.021). DPPE plus DOX was associated with more gastrointestinal and CNS toxicity. No consistent influence on QOL was detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no advantage in RR, RD, or PFS but significantly superior OS for DPPE plus DOX. Additional studies of DPPE are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyno et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. DPPE (tesmilifene) plus doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin alone was evaluated on overall survival (OS) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.91, p=0.021). DPPE plus doxorubicin was statistically superior to doxorubicin alone for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.91; P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: