Key result
Higher social capital, such as having high trust in relatives and friends, was significantly associated with lower odds of depression among critically ill patients in rural China (OR 0.61).
Why the study?
With an increasing number of critically ill patients, attention is needed for both physical and mental health, prompting an examination of the links between depression and social capital in this population.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,043)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.39–0.94)
p-value: p=0.026
Higher social capital is associated with a lower likelihood of depression among critically ill patients in rural China, highlighting the importance of social and community support for mental health.
Supports social capital assessment in rural critically ill patients; hypothesis-generating for prospective intervention trials.
BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of critically ill patients, attention should be paid to both their physical health and mental health. The objective of this study is to examine the links between depression and social capital among critically ill patients. METHODS: Data for 1043 patients with critical illnesses was collected with a stratified cluster random sampling method in rural Shandong, China. Depression symptoms were measured using a short form version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) and the total scores of them were dichotomized. We associated structural social capital with social networks, social participation, and social support. Cognitive social capital includes the degree of availability of social trust and reciprocity. Binary logistic regression was used to explore whether social capital was significantly associated with depression among patients with critical illnesses. RESULTS: We found that 68.5% of the critically ill patients in our sample population had depression. CESD-10 scores were negatively correlated with social capital, including occupations of their frequent contacts, social trust in relatives and friends, distance to the nearest medical institution and medical assistance convenience from non-spouse. In addition, low economic status, and low self-rated health were more significantly correlated with depression in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that more attention should be paid to the mental health of critically ill patients and more formal society, community and government support form given, particularly in rural China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Critical illnesses and depression (n=1,043). High social capital (e.g., trust in relatives and friends) vs. Low social capital was evaluated on Depression (CESD-10 score ≥ 10) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, p=0.026). Higher social capital, such as having high trust in relatives and friends, was significantly associated with lower odds of depression among critically ill patients in rural China (OR 0.61).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: