Key result
ITF-1697 infusion during and after primary PCI for AMI did not improve post-procedure perfusion, clinical outcomes up to 30 days, or reduce myocardial damage compared to placebo.
Why the study?
Does intravenous infusion of ITF-1697 improve reperfusion, reduce infarct size, or improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI?
RCT (n=402)
double blind
randomised
Yes
Does intravenous infusion of ITF-1697 improve reperfusion, reduce infarct size, or improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI?
Intravenous ITF-1697 was safe but failed to improve myocardial perfusion, reduce infarct size, or improve clinical outcomes in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI.
ITF-1697 should not be used in primary PCI for AMI; confirms lack of benefit on perfusion, infarct size, or 30-day outcomes.
AIM: ITF-1697 is a C-reactive protein-derived tetrapeptide that, based on pre-clinical studies, is thought to reduce reperfusion injury. We performed a dose-finding study to assess safety, preliminary efficacy and clinical outcome of prolonged i.v. infusion of ITF-1697 in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multicentre dose-finding study that was randomised, double blind, and placebo-controlled. Four hundred and two patients were enrolled. Intravenous infusion of four dosages of ITF-1697 (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 microg/kg/min) or placebo was started before PCI and continued for 24 h. After interim analysis of data from 242 patients the study continued with the 0.1 and 1.0 microg/kg/min ITF-1697 regimes. Analysis did not raise any safety concerns. Post-procedure perfusion, assessed by TIMI flow, corrected TIMI frame count, blushgrade and ST-segment resolution, was similar for the placebo, 0.1 and 1.0 microg/kg/min regimes. Furthermore, the results showed no differences between the treatment regimes in enzymatic infarct size or clinical outcome up to 30 days. CONCLUSION: ITF-1697 was well tolerated. However, neither a dose-relation nor improvement of perfusion, clinical outcome or reduction of myocardial damage could be demonstrated with ITF-1697 during and after primary PCI for AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maurits T. Dirksen (2004) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=402). ITF-1697 vs. placebo was evaluated on Post-procedure perfusion, enzymatic infarct size, and clinical outcome up to 30 days. ITF-1697 infusion during and after primary PCI for AMI did not improve post-procedure perfusion, clinical outcomes up to 30 days, or reduce myocardial damage compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: