This study compares the expenditure patterns and characteristics of high-cost dual eligibles to normative-cost dual eligibles within institutional and community settings. Using claims records for people dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid in 18 California counties (n=349,433) in 2000, high-cost users in the long-stay institutional care setting spent a much higher amount and a much greater proportion of total costs in Medi-Cal (61%) but spent less proportionally in Medicare (39%) than high-cost users in the long-term community care (66% of total costs from Medicare) or episodic care (79% of total costs from Medicare) setting. Although individuals who are long-stay nursing facility residents are high-cost in the overall sample, multinomial logistic regressions revealed that the impact of diseases/conditions on high-cost status varied within each setting. These findings suggest that policymakers and providers should consider care setting as an important component when designing disease management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yip et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: