Key result
Speckle tracking echocardiography demonstrated greater myocardial dysfunction in patients with septic shock compared to sepsis controls (GLS -14.5% vs -18.3%), while LVEF was similar among groups.
Why the study?
Does speckle tracking echocardiography better detect myocardial dysfunction compared to left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock?
Does speckle tracking echocardiography better detect myocardial dysfunction compared to left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speckle tracking echocardiography (global longitudinal strain) is more sensitive than left ventricular ejection fraction for detecting sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.
Ng et al. [1] reported the results of a very interesting study on sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction. The authors elegantly matched patients with septic shock (90-day mortality of 41.9 %) with a control group of patients with sepsis (90-day mortality of 0 %) using a relatively novel and more sophisticated echocardiographic approach for the diagnosis of myocardial dysfunction in septic patients—speckle tracking echocardiography. With this approach, systolic dysfunction was assessed by means of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and showed a greater degree of myocardial dysfunction in patients with septic shock compared with controls (GLS −14.5 versus −18.3 %, respectively). On the other hand, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar among groups, again confirming that LVEF does not seem appropriate for evaluating myocardial dysfunction in such a population. This finding is in agreement with recent evidence suggesting no correlation between LVEF and mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, while an association between diastolic dysfunction and mortality has been suggested [2].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanfilippo et al. (2016) conducted a letter in Severe sepsis or septic shock. Speckle tracking echocardiography (Global longitudinal strain) vs. Sepsis controls was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS). Speckle tracking echocardiography demonstrated greater myocardial dysfunction in patients with septic shock compared to sepsis controls (GLS -14.5% vs -18.3%), while LVEF was similar among groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: