Godsil-McKay switching is an operation on graphs that doesn’t change the spectrum of the adjacency matrix. Usually (but not always) the obtained graph is non-isomorphic with the original graph. We present a straightforward sufficient condition for being isomorphic after switching, and give examples which show that this condition is not necessary. For some graph products we obtain sufficient conditions for being non-isomorphic after switching. As an example we find that the tensor product of the grid L(l,m) (l > m>2) and a graph with at least one vertex of degree two is not determined by its adjacency spectrum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: