Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging with the first available device (ISO-C-3D; Siemens, Germany) has shown potential benefit in foot and ankle surgery. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical use of the second-generation device (ARCADIS-3D; Siemens) in comparison with earlier experience with the first-generation device. METHODS: In a matched pair study, the ISO-C-3D/ARCADIS-3D was used for intraoperative visualization after reduction/correction and internal fixation. The ISO-C-3D was used in 62 cases between January 1, 2003, and March 15, 2004, and the ARCADIS-3D was used in cases with similar fractures and arthrodesis location between September 1, 2006, and April 30, 2008. Potentially, changes in implant position and/or reduction were made after device use. Time spent and changes resulting from the use of ISO-C-3D/ARCADIS-3D were registered and analyzed. RESULTS: On average, the operation was interrupted for 440/320 seconds (ISO-C-3D/ARCADIS-3D), 120/60 seconds, on average, for the scan, and 210/180 seconds, on average, for evaluation of the images by the surgeon. In 39%/34% of the cases (24/21 of 62), the reduction and/or implant position was corrected during the same procedure after the ISO-C-3D/ARCADIS-3D scan. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative 3-dimensional visualization with the ISO-C-3D/ARCADIS-3D can provide useful information that cannot be obtained from plain films or conventional C-arms. The second-generation device (ARCADIS-3D) provides faster scan and evaluation that reduces time spent. No other benefits were seen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richter et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: