Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previously, this laboratory conceptualized a new phantom for calibration or performance testing of whole body counters using Monte Carlo simulations. This paper describes the physical reality that was created from the Monte Carlo design project and compares its counting efficiency to that of a conventional BOMAB phantom using two whole body counters. In one counter (NaI based) the agreement between the two phantoms was +/-8% and in the second counter (Ge based) the agreement was +/-5% at all the energies measured (126 keV, 661 keV, 1172 keV, 1330 keV). The advantage of the sliced phantom is that the sources are solid, sealed, and cannot leak activity thereby simplifying packing for shipment if the phantom is classified as a Dangerous Good. The new phantom is, therefore, ideal for uses that involve shipment, such as an intercomparison exercise. The phantom is also re-usable as the sources can be changed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kramer et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: