Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon (C) storage in biomass and soils is a function of climate, vegetation type, soil type and land management. Carbon storage was examined in intact indigenous vegetation and under different land uses in thicket (250–400 mm mean annual precipitation), xeric shrubland (350 mm), karoo (250 mm), and grassland (900–1200 mm). Carbon storage was as follows: (i) mean soil C (0–50 cm): thicket (T) = grassland (G) > xeric shrubland on Dwyka sediments (XS) > xeric shrubland on dolerite (XSD) > karoo (K) (168, 164, 65, 34 & 26 t ha−1, respectively); (ii) mean root C: T > G > XS = XSD (25.4, 11.4, 7.2 & 7.1 t ha−1); (iii) mean above-ground C including leaf litter: T>XS>G>K> XSD (51.6, 12.9, 2.0, 1.7 & 1.51 ha−1). Carbon stocks in intact indigenous vegetation were related more to woodiness of vegetation and frequency of fire than to climate. Biomass C was greatest in woody thicket and soil C stocks were greatest in thicket and grassland. Total C storage of 245 t ha−9 in thicket is exceptionally high for a semi-arid region and is comparable with mesic forests. Soil C dominated ecosystem C storage in grassland and was influenced more by soil parent material than land use. The semi-arid sites (xeric shrubland and thicket) were more sensitive to effects of land use on C storage than the grassland site. Effects of land use on C stocks were site- and land use-specific and defied prediction in many instances. The results suggest that modelling of national C stocks would benefit from further research on the interactions between C storage, land use, and soil properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mills et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: