Goetsch, A.L. and Patil, A.R. 1997. Relationships among splanchnic tissue energy consumption and net flux of nutrients, feed intake and digestibility in wethers consuming forage-based diets ad libitum. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 11: 1–18. Data from crossbred catheterized wethers (38±0.6 kg body weight) consuming forage-based diets ad libitum in eleven experiments were used to determine relationships among splanchnic tissue energy consumption and net flux of nutrients, feed intake and digestibility. Portal-drained viscera (PDV) and hepatic energy consumption increased linearly as digestible energy intake (DEI) increased (PDV energy consumption, Mcal/d = 0.2005 + 0.0660 [DEI, Mcal/d], R2 = 22%; hepatic energy consumption, Mcal/d = 0.1457 + 0.0659 [DEI, Mcal/d], R2 = 25%). However, improvements in R2 occurred when other independent variables were included in regressions (PDV energy consumption, Mcal/d = −0.0112 + 0.1859 [DEI, Mcal/d]—0.0254 [DEI2, Mcal/d] + [fecal neutral detergent fiber, kg/d], R2 = 34%; hepatic energy consumption = 0.0014 + 0.0266 [DEI, Mcal/d] + 0.3325 [PDV energy consumption, Mcal/d] + 0.0745 [hepatic urea nitrogen net flux, M/d] + 0.0016 [body weight, kg], R2 = 48%). Splanchnic bed energy consumption as a percentage of DEI was best described (R2 = 49%) by 43.611–9.531 [DEI, Mcal/d] + 15.914 [fecal neutral detergent fiber, kg/d] + 6.057 [hepatic urea nitrogen net flux, M/d]. A regression of hepatic urea nitrogen net flux on hepatic net fluxes of alpha-amino and ammonia nitrogen accounted for 25% of variation, of which 55 and 45% was attributable to alpha-amino and ammonia nitrogen, respectively. In conclusion, factors besides physiological workload as depicted by DEI accounted for variability in energy consumed by splanchnic tissues with ad libitum ingestion of forage-based diets. The decreasing proportion of DEI attributable to splanchnic bed use may contribute to change in animal performance with increasing DEI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goetsch et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: