Carbohydrate‐deficient transferrin (CDT) has previously been reported to be an excellent marker of male alcoholics. Less is known of its efficiency among women and especially of early‐phase alcohol abuse in nonselected populations. The present population‐based study examined the diagnostic value of CDT among consecutive women, including 13 teetotallers, 135 social drinkers (mean alcohol consumption 45 ± 34 g/week), and 57 nonalcoholic heavy drinkers (197 ± 97 g/week). Sixty‐two women with a well‐documented history of chronic alcoholism (942 ± 191 g/week) were also studied, as well as 36 pregnant women used as a reference group. Two weeks of abstinence among 11 alcoholics was followed. The CDT (containing part of isotransferrin with pl = 5.7, 5.8, and 5.9) was separated by anion exchange chromatography and assayed by radioimmunoassay. In the whole material, CDT correlated significantly with alcohol consumption (r= 0.43, p < 0.001) but not with conventional markers (γ‐glutamyltransferase, AST, ALT, and mean corpuscular volume). The CDT values of alcoholics (34 ± 20 units/liter) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than those of teetotallers (19 ± 6 units/liter), social drinkers (20 ± 6 units/liter), or pregnant women (16 ± 13 units/ liter). Heavy drinkers also had higher values (25 ± 13 units/liter), but the difference did not reach statistic significance. The specificity of CDT was on the level of conventional markers when the cut‐off value was increased from 26 to 29 units/liter. At a specificity of 95%, CDT found 19% of the heavy drinkers and 52% of the alcoholics; the best traditional marker, AST, with a specificity of 97%, found 7% and 56%, respectively. CDT was useful for follow‐up of alcohol withdrawal when its initial value was elevated. In general, CDT (as well as conventional laboratory markers) does not seem to be sensitive enough in the detection of alcohol abuse in the female population. This is especially clear among nonalcoholic female heavy drinkers. CDT gives, however, additional information about alcohol abuse, and it may be recommended for parallel use with conventional markers in clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Löf et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: