Key result
One-year treatment with rosiglitazone worsened aerobic exercise capacity compared with placebo in men with type 2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease (-31 vs 7 seconds; P=0.009).
Why the study?
Targeting metabolic determinants of exercise performance pharmacologically to mimic or potentiate exercise effects is an attractive strategy to address poor exercise capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does rosiglitazone improve aerobic exercise capacity in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=104)
randomized
Does rosiglitazone improve aerobic exercise capacity in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease?
In men with T2DM and stable CAD, 1-year treatment with rosiglitazone worsened aerobic exercise capacity, an effect strongly predicted by subcutaneous fat mass gain.
May worsen aerobic capacity in men with type 2 diabetes and CAD; leaves open effects on outcomes and generalizability.
Targeting metabolic determinants of exercise performance with pharmacological agents that would mimic/potentiate the effects of exercise represents an attractive clinical alternative to counterbalance the poor exercise capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We examined the effect of 1-yr treatment with the insulin sensitizer peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ agonist rosiglitazone on aerobic exercise capacity and body fat composition/distribution in men with T2DM and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). One-hundred four men (age: 64 ± 7 yr; body mass index: 30.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2) with T2DM and CAD were randomized to receive rosiglitazone or placebo for 1 yr. Aerobic exercise capacity (exercise duration) was assessed with a maximal treadmill test, and body composition/distribution were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry/computed tomography scans. At 1 yr, patients with T2DM under PPARγ agonist treatment showed a reduction in aerobic exercise capacity compared with the control group (exercise duration change, −31 ± 8 versus 7 ± 11 s, P = 0.009). Significant increases in body fat mass (3.1 ± 0.4 kg, 12%), abdominal and mid-thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) levels, and mid-thigh skeletal muscle fat were found (all P < 0.01), whereas no effect on visceral AT levels was observed ( P > 0.05) under treatment. Subcutaneous fat mass gained under PPARγ agonist was the strongest predictor of the worsening in aerobic exercise capacity ( P > 0.0001); no association was found with skeletal muscle fat infiltration nor visceral AT. Treatment with the insulin sensitizer PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone in patients with T2DM and CAD is associated with a worsening in aerobic exercise capacity, which seems to be mainly attributable to weight gain and subcutaneous fat mass expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bastien et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary artery disease (n=104). Rosiglitazone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Aerobic exercise capacity (exercise duration change in seconds) (p=0.009). One-year treatment with rosiglitazone worsened aerobic exercise capacity compared with placebo in men with type 2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease (-31 vs 7 seconds; P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: