Crystals of undoped and laser active Yb-doped NaT 1 - x Yb x (WO 4 ) 2, T = Y ( x = 0, 0.1), Lu ( x = 0, 0.1, 0.5), have been grown by the Czochralski (T = Y) or the top seeded solution growth (T = Lu) methods, depending on their melting nature, congruent or incongruent, respectively. From single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, the noncentrosymmetric tetragonal space group I 4̄ has been established for all of them. The Na + /T 3+ (Yb 3+ ) occupancy factors for 2 b and 2 d sites show the lowest departure from the random distribution, and thus the largest cationic disorder, in NaLu 0.9 Yb 0.1 (WO 4 ) 2, namely 0.43/0.57 and 0.56/0.44, respectively. The thermal expansion tensors have been determined up to 973 K for the five crystals; NaLu(WO 4 ) 2 with α 1 =8.2(2) × 10 - 6 K - 1 and α 3 = 17.3(4) × 10 - 6 K - 1 coefficients has lower anisotropy than NaY(WO 4 ) 2 with α 1 = 8.4(2) × 10 - 6 K - 1 and α 3 =18.5(4) × 10 - 6 K - 1 coefficients. From the point of view of the thermal steadiness, the evaluation of the Yb-doped laser layer/optically inert substrate lattice mismatch, about 2.5 times higher for NaY 0.9 Yb 0.1 (WO 4 ) 2 /NY(WO 4 ) 2 than for NaLu 0.9 Yb 0.1 (WO 4 ) 2 /NaLu(WO 4 ) 2 at temperatures up to 973 K, points out to this last set as the best simple combination of tetragonal Na-based double tungstates intended for epitaxially grown laser active composites. An approach to minimize the laser layer/substrate lattice mismatch derived of the Yb incorporation in the layer is developed through the tailoring of the composition of its optically inert substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: