Key result
This review details the pathological features of the full spectrum of left-ventricular hypoplasia, highlighting primary defining lesions and factors affecting surgical repair and long-term outcomes.
Provides a comprehensive review of the anatomical and pathological features of left-ventricular hypoplasia to guide surgical considerations, including biventricular repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide surgical planning in left-ventricular hypoplasia; leaves open prospective validation of repair strategies.
Left-ventricular (LV) hypoplasia encompasses a range of LV sizes, varying from a mildly underdeveloped, but functionally adequate, chamber to the miniscule, barely perceptible LV cavity seen in hypoplastic left-heart syndrome. Associated malformations include obstructive lesions of LV inflow, outflow, and the aortic arch, often in combination. Repair of complex combinations and/or severe LV hypoplasia usually results in a single-ventricle anatomy with the right ventricle serving as the systemic ventricle. New therapeutic interventions, including fetal procedures, are expanding the spectrum of lesions and LV sizes that may be amenable to a biventricular repair. These surgical considerations place renewed emphasis on understanding the anatomical features associated with LV hypoplasia. This review details pathological features of the full spectrum of LV hypoplasia, particularly those with borderline severe hypoplasia. Primary defining lesions are described as well as additional lesions that may affect clinical symptoms, surgical repair, and long-term outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Debra L. Kearney (2013) conducted a review in Left-ventricular hypoplasia. Left-ventricular hypoplasia was evaluated. This review details the pathological features of the full spectrum of left-ventricular hypoplasia, highlighting primary defining lesions and factors affecting surgical repair and long-term outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: