Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Magnesium, lanthanum, and titanium oxide‐doped nickel–chromium/alumina catalysts were prepared and their performances assessed in the steam reforming of naphthalene (T: 1,023 K; water‐to‐naphthalene molar ratio: 16, atmospheric pressure, residence time of 0.55 s; and GHSV = 10,080 h −1 ). Impregnation of nickel and chromium in MgO‐ and La 2 O 3 ‐doped alumina gave the most active, stable catalysts. Nickel was active in aromatic ring opening, while chromium inhibited the encapsulation of the nickel clystallites by inactive carbon filaments. The use of MgO had a signifkant effect on the robustness of catalyst due to the formation of MgAl 2 O 4 spinelphase. La 2 O 3 was necessaly to drive the reaction toward total gasification. The addition of TiO 2 gave poor activity and a soft catalyst. Some of the catalyst preparations were characterized before and after reaction by XRD, SEM, DTA, and surface measurements. The physical and catalytic properties are discussed in light of these characterizations. The catalyst optimized during this study showed high clystallite dispersion, excellent crushing strength, and good thermal stability. When comparing the data obtained using Ni/Al 2 O 3 with Ni–Cr/Al 2 0 3 ·MgO·La 2 O 3 , it is clear that the improved catalyst reached higher conversion and gas yield performances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bangala et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: