This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A prospective study was performed to clarify the surgical outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma who would benefit from induction chemotherapy followed by surgery. Of 55 eligible patients, 42 (76.3%) agreed to randomization with either chemotherapy followed by surgery (n = 21) or surgery alone (n = 21). The other 13 refused. The chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. All 55 patients underwent esophagectomy with two- or three-field resection, including two (3.6%) hospital mortalities. Of the 21 patients receiving chemotherapy, the response rate was 33.3% after the first course and 60% after the second course. A complete response was not obtained. Responders to the first course showed a prolonged survival, however time to treatment failure did not differ between patients treated with chemotherapy followed by surgery or surgery alone. This chemotherapy offered a worse surgical outcome for patients with pretreatment diagnosis of T3. Multivariate analysis identified a partial response to the first course of chemotherapy to be a favorable prognostic indicator. Preoperative chemotherapy does not give a survival benefit over surgery alone for patients with advanced tumor (T3). Initial response to the first dose of chemotherapy is deemed to be a prognostic factor for patients with less advanced tumor (T1/T2).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baba et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: