The novel ligand 2,6-bis[S-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)sulfanylmethyl]pyridine (H(2)L1) and its copper(II) complex Cu(L1), 1, were synthesized with the aim of constructing a model of the active site of the enzyme galactose oxidase (GOase). Cyclic voltammetry studies show that 1 undergoes ligand-based quasi-reversible oxidations (phenolate/phenoxyl) and reversible metal-based reduction [copper(II)/copper(I)] similar to those of GOase, but at potentials much higher and lower, respectively, than those found for the enzyme. At room temperature, spectrophotometric titrations show that 1 binds strongly to 1 equiv of pyridine. In frozen solutions (77 K), 1 quantitatively binds both pyridine and ethers (e.g., 1,4-dioxane) as assessed by X- and Q-band EPR spectroscopy. Profound shifts in the pattern of g values result, from rhombic (g(1) > g(2) > g(3)) in toluene to either inverted axial patterns (g(1) = g(2) >> g(3)) in the presence of ethers or a near-axial pattern (g(1) >> g(2) > g(3)) in the presence of pyridine. Crystallographic analyses of the parent complex 1.MeCN, the dioxane-bridged dimer [(Cu(L1))(2)((mu-1,4)-1,4-dioxane)].(Me(2)CO)(2) (2), and the pyridine complex [Cu(L1)(pyridine)] (3) show that the pyridine and ether ligands bond to copper at a sixth octahedral position left vacant by the pentadentate NO(2)S(2) coordination mode of L1(2-) and induce perturbations of its geometry. Hybrid DFT calculations based on the crystallographic coordinates combined with perturbation theory expressions for the g values of a d(9) system correlate the results from EPR spectroscopy to the proportions of d(x)(2)(-)(y)(2) and d(z)(2) character in the relevant copper-centered unoccupied molecular orbital. The combination of spectroscopic, structural, and computational results for this set of copper(II) complexes provides a demonstrative example of the physical phenomena underlying rhombic EPR spectra of d(9) systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratt et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: