Key result
Long-term aquatic exercise was associated with significantly higher flow-mediated dilation compared to a sedentary lifestyle (11.2% vs. 5.0%, p<0.0005), with no significant differences observed between aquatic, land-based, and mixed exercise modes.
Why the study?
Aquatic exercise is considered as a co-adjuvant rehabilitation form, but evidence for its cardiovascular risk-reduction properties in older adults is limited.
Does long-term aquatic exercise improve cardiovascular function (FMD and CVC) in older adults compared to land-based exercise or a sedentary lifestyle?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Single-blind
No
Does long-term aquatic exercise improve cardiovascular function (FMD and CVC) in older adults compared to land-based exercise or a sedentary lifestyle?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.2% vs 5%
p-value: p=<0.0005
Long-term aquatic exercise improves micro- and macro-circulatory endothelial function in older adults to a similar extent as land-based exercise, offering a viable cardiovascular risk-reduction strategy.
Long-term aquatic exercise was associated with better endothelial function versus inactivity in older adults; leaves open advantages over land-based modes or practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular aging is implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Aquatic exercise is being considered as a co-adjuvant form of rehabilitation, but there is limited evidence for its cardiovascular risk-reduction properties for older people. Our study aimed to address this by exploring the cardiovascular effects of long-term aquatic exercise in older adults in comparison to those who are either inactive or engaged in land-based/mixed training by measurement of micro- and macro-circulation. Flow Mediated Dilatation (FMD) was the primary outcome. METHODS: = 20) groups. The Aqua group (aged 63.7 ± 7 years) and Land group (aged 65 ± 6 years) consisted of participants engaged in aquatic and land-based training, respectively. The mixed group (Mix) (aged 66 ± 6 years) consisted of participants engaged in both land-based and aquatic training. Self-reported training consisted of ≥2/week for ≥6 months (mean sessions/week = 4 ± 1, 4 ± 1, and 5 ± 2 for each group, respectively). The sedentary group (Sed) (aged 63 ± 6 years) consisted of people who were sedentary for ≥6 months (mean sessions/week 0 ± 0). The primary outcome was %FMD. Secondary outcomes included raw cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) and CVC max. RESULTS: < 0.0005, between the Aqua group and Sed group, for %FMD). No specific advantage could be attributed to any one of the exercise groups. CONCLUSION: We reported improvements in NO-mediated endothelial function at micro- and macro-circulatory levels, observing no differences between exercise modes. Our findings provide evidence for the role of aquatic exercise as a "shield" against CVD in older populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klonizakis et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy aging (n=80). Long-term aquatic exercise vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Flow Mediated Dilatation (%FMD) (p=<0.0005). Long-term aquatic exercise was associated with significantly higher flow-mediated dilation compared to a sedentary lifestyle (11.2% vs. 5.0%, p<0.0005), with no significant differences observed between aquatic, land-based, and mixed exercise modes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: