Key result
Multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria achieved up to 81% accuracy in distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of dyspnea, outperforming univariate (50%) and bivariate (63%) criteria.
Why the study?
Do multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria more accurately distinguish cardiac from noncardiac causes of dyspnea compared to univariate or bivariate criteria during cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
Observational (n=54)
Blinded interpretation
Do multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria more accurately distinguish cardiac from noncardiac causes of dyspnea compared to univariate or bivariate criteria during cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 50%
Multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria incorporating age, sex, height, and weight provide superior diagnostic accuracy over simple univariate or bivariate criteria for distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of dyspnea during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Retrospective analysis of peak oxygen pulse criteria in 54 patients leaves open the optimal threshold for distinguishing cardiac exercise limitation.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides oxygen pulse as a continuous measure of stroke volume, which is superior to other stress-testing methods in which systolic function is measured at baseline and at peak stress. However, the optimal peak oxygen pulse criterion for distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of exercise limitation is unknown. In comparing several peak oxygen pulse criteria against the clinical standard of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, we retrospectively studied 54 consecutive patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. These exercise tests included measurement of oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, breathing reserve, arterial blood gases at baseline and at peak stress, exercise electrocardiogram, heart rate, and blood pressure response. Results were blindly interpreted and patients were categorized as members either of our Cardiac Group (abnormal result secondary to cardiac causes of exercise limitation) or of our Noncardiac Group (normal or abnormal result secondary to any noncardiac cause of exercise limitation). The accuracy of the peak oxygen pulse criteria ranged from 50% for univariate criterion (≤15 mL/beat), to 61% for oxygen pulse curve pattern, to 63% for bivariate criterion (≤15 mL/beat for men, ≤10 mL/beat for women), to as high as 81% for a multivariate criterion. All multivariate criteria outperformed oxygen pulse curve pattern, univariate, and bivariate criteria. This is the first study to evaluate the optimal peak oxygen pulse criterion for differentiating cardiac from noncardiac causes of exercise limitation. Multivariate criteria (especially a criterion incorporating age, sex, height, and weight) should be used preferentially, as opposed to the commonly used univariate and bivariate criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Dyspnea and exercise limitation (n=54). Multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria vs. Univariate, bivariate, and oxygen pulse curve pattern criteria was evaluated on Accuracy in distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of exercise limitation. Multivariate peak oxygen pulse criteria achieved up to 81% accuracy in distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of dyspnea, outperforming univariate (50%) and bivariate (63%) criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: