Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Constructions that inhibit the formation of long-distance dependencies like wh-questions are known as islands. In Spanish, it has been claimed that pre-verbal subjects are islands but post-verbal subjects are not. Previous experiments have found robust evidence of island effects for pre-verbal Spanish subjects but have not tested the crucial question of subject position. We fill this gap, using a formal acceptability judgment experiment to compare extractions from pre-verbal subjects to those from post-verbal subjects, while holding all else as constant as possible. For pre-verbal subjects, we find a large island effect, while for post-verbal subjects we find a small effect, without a clear decrease for the violation condition. Examining individual variation, we observe that most participants consistently accept extraction from post-verbal position but not pre-verbal, and we observe no effects of working memory on judgments. We argue our findings indicate a contrast by position and broadly support a structural view of subject islands. We also address methodological and interpretative debates in experimental syntax regarding both the presence of an island effect and the source of that effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoot et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: