Closed-form analytical expressions for the electric and magnetic (EM) field components of a high-order Bessel vortex beam of fractional type {α} (HOBVB-F{α}) are derived based on the axial polarization of the vector potentials [denoted by (z,-z)]. The fields' components correspond to the most generalized case of quasi-standing-waves that reduce to perfect (i.e., equiamplitude) standing waves or progressive waves with appropriate choice of the quasi-standing-wave coefficient 0≤Υ≤1. The beam components are exact solutions of the vector wave equation (Helmholtz equation) and Maxwell's equations. Moreover, computations of the EM components and comparison with the results obtained from a transverse polarization scheme [denoted by (x,{-}y)] illustrate the analysis. In addition, the time-averaged angular momentum density and flux are evaluated with particular emphasis on the axial and transverse polarization states of the vector potentials. It is found that the quasi-standing-wave effect does not influence the spatial distributions of the EM components in the transverse polarization scheme (x,{-}y); however, it affects the transverse EM field components in the axial polarization (z,{-}z). Moreover, both the linear and angular momenta density fluxes are shown to reverse sign for a particular value of the half-cone angle {β}. These phenomena anticipate the production of a ``tractor'' beam where particulate matter may be pulled back toward the source, and a spinning reversal effect in which particulate matter may rotate with opposite handedness to a HOBVB-F{α}. The results are particularly useful in applications involving optical laser tweezers, tractor beams, optical spanners, arbitrary scattering, radiation force, angular momentum, and torque.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
F.G. Mitri (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: