This article discusses a method for controlling variation in industrial processes when the model parameters are estimated from data and subject to uncertainty. A static input/output relationship with multiple input variables and an integrated moving average disturbance model are assumed. Most robust control methods use deterministic measures of uncertainty and a control objective that focuses on worst-case performance. This work uses a probabilistic measure of uncertainty and a control objective that relates more closely to minimizing variation, where parameter estimation errors are treated simply as an additional source of variability. We show that this approach results in a higher probability of closed-loop stability than the standard minimum variance control and can substantially lessen the adverse impact of parameter uncertainty on closed-loop variance. Guidelines for designing and evaluating the experiment used to estimate the model parameters are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apley et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: