Key result
Diabetic patients in cardiac rehabilitation were less likely to achieve blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at discharge compared to non-diabetics (78.4% vs. 82.9%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
What proportion of diabetic versus non-diabetic patients achieve secondary prevention target levels for blood pressure, lipids, and glucose during cardiac rehabilitation?
Observational (n=40,343)
Yes
What proportion of diabetic versus non-diabetic patients achieve secondary prevention target levels for blood pressure, lipids, and glucose during cardiac rehabilitation?
In cardiac rehabilitation, diabetic patients show improved lipid profile attainment but continue to have suboptimal management of hypertension and glycemia compared to non-diabetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetic CR patients may need intensified BP focus; hypothesis-generating for tailored secondary prevention protocols.
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic patients who have suffered from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are at very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Their prognosis, however, can be improved if the target values for blood pressure (BP < 130/80 mmHg) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dl), optionally < 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dl)] are achieved. It is not known what proportion of diabetic patients receives such stringent secondary prevention measures and achieves target level attainment for BP, lipids and glucose in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). METHODS: During 2003 to 2005, 11 973 diabetic (29.7%) and 28 370 non-diabetic patients (70.3%), predominantly after ACS (74 and 80%), were included in a nationwide registry. At entry and at discharge, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy and blood pressure, lipids and blood glucose were recorded. In a mixed model approach, temporal changes between centres and within centres, respectively, were analysed. RESULTS: At discharge, a lower proportion of diabetic patients achieved normalisation of BP (in 2005: <140/90 mmHg: 78.4 vs. 82.9% in non-diabetic patients, p < 0.001) or <130/80 mmHg (45.5 vs. 49.8%), respectively. LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was more frequently attained in diabetic patients (68.2 vs. 66.5%), as was LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L (28.8 vs. 23.0%). Fasting blood glucose was not changed during the observation period, as at discharge almost a quarter of all diabetic patients exceeded the threshold value of 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dl). In 2005 at discharge, statin therapy was administered in 93% in both diabetics and non-diabetics, acetylic salicylic acid in 79% in diabetics vs. 80% in non-diabetic patients (clopidogrel: 41 vs. 45%). CONCLUSION: Generally there is room for improvement in the management of cardiac risk factors for both patients groups. In diabetic patients in CR at high risk for recurrent cardiac events, in recent years an improvement of the lipid profile has been observed. Hypertension and glycaemia are still not optimally addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Völler et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease in cardiac rehabilitation (n=40,343). Diabetes vs. Non-diabetic patients was evaluated on Blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at discharge (p=< 0.001). Diabetic patients in cardiac rehabilitation were less likely to achieve blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at discharge compared to non-diabetics (78.4% vs. 82.9%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: