Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complexes A and B are isomeric but have different bridging pathways linking the two Ru(II) centers. Electrochemical and UV/vis/NIR spectroelectrochemical measurements both show that the metal−metal electronic coupling is considerably stronger in B than in A despite the greater metal−metal separation, because the oxidized Ru(II)/Ru(III) mixed-valence state can be delocalized by hole transfer across the (oxidizable) bis-phenolate bridge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laye et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: