A three-year field experiment was conducted to determine how integrating different furrow-applied mulches would influence the yield and water use efficiency (WUE) for corn (Zea mays L.) cultivated under a plastic-covered ridge and furrow rainwater harvesting (PRFRH) system in semi-arid lands of China's Loess Plateau. The effect of the mulching treatments in combination with PRFRH was compared to the conventional flat (control, T1). The furrow-applied mulching treatments and their designation were: none or bare furrow (T2); liquid film (T3); 8% biodegradable film (T4); 10-cm thick layer of corn stover (T5); and 0.08 mm thick plastic film (T6). Corn was planted in the furrows on either side of the plastic-covered ridges of the plots for treatments T2 though T6. Soil moisture was measured gravimetrically on auger samples taken at 6 locations in each plot at intervals of 20 cm from the 0 to 200 cm depth. In all years, soil moisture storage at the 0–100 cm depth was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the T2 to T6 treatment plots compared to T1. No such effect was observed for the 100–200 cm depths. The integrated use of PRFRH and furrow-applied mulching performed better than the bare furrow treatment increasing the three-year average grain yield and harvest index (HI). WUE decreases followed the order: T6 > T4 > T3 > T2 > T5 > T1, indicating that mulching most likely reduced soil evaporation losses and suggesting that integrated PRFRH + mulch systems has potential to increase crop sustainability in this semiarid region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: