Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning study demonstrates improved 15-minute wind power forecasting using multi-height and temporal features, indicating that full-feature sets outperform dimensionality reduction.
Accurate 15-minute-ahead wind-power forecasting is important for grid operation and renewable-energy integration. This study presents a systematic empirical evaluation of multi-height meteorological, physics-informed, and temporal variables for short-term wind-power forecasting. The dataset contains 35,040 observations recorded at 15-minute intervals over one year, including wind speeds measured at 10, 30, 50, and 70 m and at hub height, together with temperature, air pressure, humidity, and actual power generation. Wind shear, cubic hub-height wind speed, three power lags, four-step rolling statistics, and calendar variables were derived from these measurements. A three-hour historical window was used to predict power generation 15 min ahead. Extra Trees, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, and a voting ensemble were evaluated using a chronological 80:20 train–test division. Model performance was assessed using MAE, RMSE, sMAPE, and R², together with residual and non-parametric statistical analyses. An ablation analysis using a fixed LightGBM configuration demonstrated that multi-height measurements reduced MAE by 13.05% compared with hub-height and atmospheric inputs, while temporal features produced the largest improvement, reducing MAE by 61.36% relative to the preceding configuration. Physics-informed variables provided a modest, statistically non-significant improvement ( \(\:p=0.0587\) ). PCA reduced the feature dimension from 228 to 50 components but degraded forecasting accuracy. The best ablation configuration, which retained multi-height, atmospheric, physics-informed and temporal variables without PCA, achieved an MAE of 5.9389 MW, RMSE of 10.0148 MW and an R² of 0.9634. These findings provide empirical evidence that multi-height and temporal information contribute to short-term wind-power forecasting, while dimensionality reduction does not necessarily improve predictive accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manickam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: