Key result
Empagliflozin alleviates LPS-induced tracheal injury in rats by reducing inflammation and downregulating IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling.
Why the study?
To investigate the potential protective effects of empagliflozin against lipopolysaccharide-induced tracheal injury, focusing on epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tracheal basal stem cells.
Does empagliflozin mitigate lipopolysaccharide-induced tracheal injury in adult male rats?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind (investigators and data analyst blinded)
Randomly assigned using online GraphPad random number calculator
No
Does empagliflozin mitigate lipopolysaccharide-induced tracheal injury in adult male rats?
Empagliflozin demonstrates protective effects against LPS-induced tracheal injury in rats via anti-inflammatory, antioxidant mechanisms, and stem cell preservation.
Empagliflozin may mitigate LPS-induced tracheal injury in rats; leaves open translation to human airway disease pending clinical trials.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a component of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall and is considered a potent inflammatory inducer. Empagliflozin (EMPA) is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor used in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Interleukin-6/Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (IL-6/JAK/STAT3) signaling pathway is essential in driving inflammation, fibrosis, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Tracheal basal stem cells are responsible for epithelial regeneration after injury. This study aimed to investigate the potential protective effects of EMPA against LPS-induced tracheal injury, with emphasis on EMT and tracheal basal stem cells. Sixty adult male rats were allocated into four groups: control; EMPA, which received EMPA (10 mg/kg/day) via oral gavage for 28 days; LPS, which received single intratracheal dose of LPS (5 mg/kg) on day 1; and LPS + EMPA, which received single LPS dose and EMPA for 28 days. Tracheal specimens were processed for biochemical, histological, immunohistochemical and RT-quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Compared to the LPS group, the LPS + EMPA group showed marked improvement of histological, ultrastructural ,and biochemical alterations including maintenance of epithelial and cilia integrity, decreased lipid peroxidation, stimulated antioxidant enzyme activities, reduced serum inflammatory cytokines, increased percentage area of E-cadherin (an epithelial marker) immunostaining, decreased percentage area of fibrosis, vimentin (a mesenchymal marker), and pro-apoptotic Bax; and enhanced percentage area of cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) (stem cell marker). Moreover, EMPA downregulated the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway involved in EMT. In conclusion, EMPA alleviated LPS-induced tracheal injury through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, downregulation of IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway, and preservation of the tracheal basal stem cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarhan et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in LPS-induced tracheal injury (n=60). Empagliflozin vs. LPS alone (vehicle) was evaluated on Histological, ultrastructural, and biochemical alterations (including oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and EMT markers) (p=<0.05). Empagliflozin alleviated LPS-induced tracheal injury in rats by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, downregulating the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway, and preserving tracheal basal stem cells.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: