Experimental study demonstrates enhanced thermal conductivity and wear resistance in carbon friction composites, indicating superior stability from multiscale silica-carbon coatings.
To address the challenges of insufficient thermal conductivity, unstable friction behavior, and interfacial wear of carbon fiber‐reinforced friction composites (CFRFCs), multiscale GNPs/nano‐SiO 2 and VGCFs/nano‐SiO 2 composite coatings were fabricated on preform surfaces by air spraying, followed by resin impregnation, hot pressing, and curing to obtain CFRFCs. The dimensional synergy between zero‐dimensional nano‐SiO 2 and carbon fillers with different geometries was systematically investigated. Results showed that nano‐SiO 2 played distinct roles in the two systems. In GNPs/nano‐SiO 2 , nano‐SiO 2 acted as point‐like spacers and defect fillers between two‐dimensional GNP sheets, forming a point–plane structure that promoted heat‐transfer pathways and lubricating film stability. In VGCFs/nano‐SiO 2 , nano‐SiO 2 was embedded in the one‐dimensional VGCF network, forming a line–point interlocking structure that enhanced interfacial anchoring and shear resistance. At a GNPs/nano‐SiO 2 mass ratio of 5:5, CFRFCs showed the best overall balance. Compared with the single GNPs‐reinforced composite, the GNPs/nano‐SiO 2 hybrid composite achieved a dynamic friction coefficient of 0.118, a dynamic/static friction coefficient ratio of 0.92, and a shear strength of 1.37 MPa at 2.96 MPa, representing increases of 9.3%, 24.32%, and 5.3%, respectively. The in‐plane thermal conductivity reached 0.51 W/(m·K), and the wear rate remained low at 0.92 × 10 −12 m 3 /(N·m). This work provides a multiscale dimensional‐synergy strategy for designing friction‐stable and wear‐resistant CFRFCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: