Key result
Beat-to-beat P-wave Random Forest classifier predicts AF recurrence with ~76% accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art CNNs.
Why the study?
Recurrence rates after transcatheter ablation for AF remain high, and early pre-ablation classification could help personalize decisions by identifying candidates with higher likelihood of clinical success.
Does a Random Forest classifier using engineered P-wave features improve the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to a Convolutional Neural Network in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Observational (n=123)
No
Does a Random Forest classifier using engineered P-wave features improve the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to a Convolutional Neural Network in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 76% vs 62%
In small datasets, a Random Forest model utilizing engineered P-wave features outperforms a state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Network for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence prior to catheter ablation.
May support P-wave ML for AF recurrence risk stratification; leaves open generalizability beyond small cohorts without prospective validation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia affecting 3% of the general population. Transcatheter ablation (CA) is the most effective treatment option for patients with AF; however, recurrence rates remain high. Early classification of patients based on pre-ablation data could help personalize decisions regarding CA by identifying candidates with a higher likelihood of clinical success. We examined 123 patients for whom we collected 6 minute, 3-lead orthogonal ECG recordings in sinus rhythm prior to the procedure, alongside clinical data. We benchmarked a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier widely used in AF prediction and found that it performed poorly, with 62% accuracy on our dataset. To improve performance, we conducted beat-to-beat P-wave analysis and formed a feature vector combining continuous wavelet transform features, 3-dimensional spatiotemporal variables, and time-domain parameters. Through recursive feature elimination, a Random Forest (RF) classifier achieved an accuracy of 76% using flat 10-fold cross-validation (CV) and maintained a generalization accuracy of 68% under leak-free 10-fold nested CV. The RF model outperformed the CNN on unseen data, offering a more effective and explainable framework. Extracting clinically interpretable features may pave the way for decision-support tools for physicians. Our study shows that when the task is challenging, such as distinguishing AF-free patients from those who relapse, and the dataset is small, simpler and computationally lighter approaches may be preferable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myrovali et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=123). Random Forest model using P-wave ECG features vs. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was evaluated on Accuracy of predicting AF recurrence at 12 months. A Random Forest classifier using beat-to-beat P-wave analysis achieved 76% accuracy in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence, outperforming a state-of-the-art CNN which achieved 62% accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: