Multi-probe cosmological analysis reveals no statistical preference for Cosmological General Relativity over Lambda CDM, suggesting apparent anisotropy stems from local bulk-flow contamination.
A companion analysis of the Pantheon+SH0ES Type Ia supernova compilation (N=1,701) found no statistically justified preference for Cosmological General Relativity(CGR) over Lambda CDM once model complexity was penalized, and showed that the nominal dipole signal recovered from supernova alone is consistent with known local bulk-flow contamination rather than with CGR's predicted cosmological anisotropy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangwha Yi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: