Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technical corrigendum reports formal corrections and 29 regression tests across ARQ M2, MOT-c, and C-Calculus models, highlighting improved mathematical consistency and specification accuracy.
This author-issued corrigendum and reproducible maintenance supplement corrects three scientific-document families: ARQ M2 initial-state and resource-accounting formulas; the missing LATENT value in the English and Russian MOT-c Appendix A examples; and the C-Calculus distinction between equivalence, directed continuation and threshold resemblance, together with an explicit finite-trace adjacency convention. The package includes four complete corrected reading editions, PDF projections, unchanged source snapshots, exact source-bound edits and 29 focused first-party regression tests. It also documents the ownership O12/O13 correction and the interpretation limit of a bounded-summary substitution control. This is a supplementary correction, not a complete replacement release of the parent compound publications. Original DOI payloads and historical test evidence remain unchanged. Exact ARQ M2 membership in a particular Zenodo deposit remains unresolved; the public SER repository commit and SHA-256 identify that source. No native runtime test, independent scientific review, new model experiment, c-specific effect, consciousness, identity or economic-value result is claimed. New explanatory text is CC BY 4.0; new maintenance code is MIT; reproduced sources retain their original attribution and applicable licenses. The wording “Zenodo deposit not yet assigned” in the PDFs reflects their pre-deposit preparation status. The DOI of this Zenodo record identifies the deposited version of the unchanged release package.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Kotov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: