Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mathematical analysis reveals disjointness between equilibrium and obstruction ranges in GL2 systems, indicating a unit-width gap from multiplicity-norm mismatch.
For GL_2 the semigroup crossed product is unavailable (the unit group SL_2(Z) is infinite, by the unit-group exclusion of Paper X) and one must pass to the Connes-Marcolli Hecke quotient, whose local factor is the Solomon zeta of M_2(Z_p), computed by the sublattice count sigma(p^n). The obstruction series obeys the GL_1-type dictionary with only the standard L-function (the symmetric square term is spurious, being quadratic in the trace), and the equilibrium range (1 + beta_c, infinity) is disjoint from the obstruction range (0, beta_c] by a gap of width exactly one, the same multiplicity-norm mismatch as Paper XII.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruqing Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: