Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy analysis reveals prudent evaluation criteria for private markets in defined contribution retirement plans, highlighting the necessity of diversified structures and robust liquidity management.
Recent regulatory initiatives have renewed interest in incorporating private markets into US defined contribution plans. The central question, however, is not whether such assets should be categorically permitted, but how plan fiduciaries can evaluate and implement them prudently. This article develops a practical framework organized around six factors identified in the US Department of Labor’s proposed rule: performance, fees, liquidity, valuation, meaningful benchmarks, and complexity. While defined benefit plans have allocated significant capital to private markets, there are differences between defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. Research suggests that private market exposure is appropriate when embedded within professionally managed, diversified vehicles supported by reliable liquidity management, valuation, benchmarking, and monitoring procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: