Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro and simulation study demonstrates enhanced network connectivity and bioactivity in lithium-doped bioglass, suggesting potential for bone regeneration.
This study used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and experimental analyses to evaluate lithium (Li)-doped 45S5 bioglass (45-L) for tissue engineering (TE) applications. Li 2 O was substituted for Na 2 O in the 45S5 bioglass composition with 0–20 mol%, then resulting in new materials labeled as 45-L0 to 45-L20. Atomic-scale characteristics were evaluated in terms of short- and medium-range structure. Short-range structure presented pair distribution function (PDF) and coordination number (CN) of the samples showing that the Li–O bonds were shorter in the structure due to the smaller ionic radius, and the CN was calculated to be 4.03. Additionally, the medium-range structure of the Li-doped BGs showed dominant non-bridging oxygens (NBOs) with negligible P–O–P bonds, while Li 2 O did not change the bond types significantly. Additionally, Q n analysis showed that the Li incorporation promoted the formation of Q 3 species and increased network connectivity (NC) from 1.92 for 45-L0 to 1.96 for 45-L20. Moreover, Li 2 O enhanced structural density but was expected to reduce the dissolution of BGs. ICP-AES analysis showed that the release of Si 4+ ions decreased with higher Li 2 O content. Meanwhile, SEM images showed a bioactive behavior of the 45-L5 sample while immersed in SBF solution for 14 days. Taken together, the integration of MD simulations, ICP-AES data and SEM showed an interesting balance of properties for moderate Li 2 O content, and especially the 45-L5 composition can be considered as a promising candidate for bone tissue regeneration applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moghanian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: