Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates an exact two-atom critical spacing law in finite periodic square-lattice Ising models, revealing a universal discrete energy support structure.
Critical partition function theory (CPFT) treats critical spacing data as probability measures rather than assuming from the outset a smooth spacing density. This permits atomic critical measures, a possibility that becomes essential for the finite periodic square-lattice Ising model. We first prove the model-independent identity W₂(μ,δ₁)²=Var_μ(s) for every unit-mean probability measure with finite second moment, identifying the CPFT coordinate $g=0$ exactly with the Wasserstein boundary point δ₁. The Ising application unexpectedly leads to a stronger finite-volume result. Writing the L× L periodic square lattice as the toroidal graph CL CL, the Ising energy is determined by the cut size b of the spin partition, E=-2JL²+2Jb. We give a constructive classification of all possible cut sizes for every L≥3. If L is odd, b∈\0\∪\4,6,8,…,2L(L-1)\, whereas if L is even, b∈\0\∪\4,6,8,…,2L²-4\∪\2L²\. Consequently the number of distinct energies is exactly $L(L-1)$ for odd L and L²-1 for even L, and adjacent distinct-energy gaps are only $4J$ and $8J$: the lower edge is always $8J$, and an additional upper-edge $8J$ gap occurs exactly for even L. It follows that the partition-function-weighted critical gap measure is an exact two-atom law for all L≥3, Pc,LPF=(1-qL)δ1/(1+qL)+qLδ2/(1+qL). At the exact Ising critical point we prove limL→∞-1/L²log qL =δ =12log2+2G/π-log(1+√2) =0.048321811322…, where G is Catalan's constant. Hence Pc,LPF→δ₁ in W₂, with limL→∞-1/L²log W₂(Pc,LPF,δ₁)=δ/2. The result was found by following an atomic CPFT critical measure back to the finite Ising spectrum. CPFT itself does not require randomness, a symmetry class, or spatial dimension as inputs of its distributional sector; nevertheless its finite-size application exposed an exact discrete support structure of a standard critical model. To the best of our knowledge, the parity-resolved all-L support classification and the resulting exact atomic CPFT boundary theorem have not previously been stated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueoka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: