Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With [Cp*Ru(OMe)] 2 ( 1 ) as starting material, a number of 2,4-pentanedionato complexes Cp*Ru(2,4-pentanedionate) were prepared. The solid-state structure of Cp*Ru(1-phenyl-2,4-pentanedionate) ( 3 ) was elucidated by X-ray crystallography, and the complex was found to be a dimer in the solid state, as previously established for Cp*Ru(2,4-pentanedionate) ( 2 ). The molecular weight of 3 in benzene indicates a dimer ( 3 - 3 ) in solution as well. Low-temperature 1 H NMR spectroscopy reveals a process involving dissociation of the dimer into monomers associated with an inversion of the pentanedionate ligand at Ru. The activation energy ( E a = 43.5 ± 0.7 kJ/mol, toluene- d 8 ) reflects the enthalpy of dissociation of the dimer. All dimers are easily cleaved with two-electron ligands L, resulting in the mononuclear complexes Cp*Ru(2,4-pentanedionate)L. Besides isolable complexes with L = phosphine, phosphite, and CO, labile adducts of the same composition with σ-S and N donor ligands (L = methyl p -tolyl sulfoxide, ethyl methyl sulfide, tetrahydrothiophene, diaza[2.2.2]bicyclooctane, 3-cyanopyridine) were detected in solution by the influence of these ligands on the observed inversion barrier. With chiral or enantiotopic ligands diastereoselective adduct formation was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koelle et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: