BACKGROUND AND AIM: The optimal time to withdraw combined biological + immunosuppressive therapy in Crohn's disease is debated. Following remission of 6 months with the combined therapy, we assessed the efficacy of monotherapy in maintaining remission. METHODS: Crohn's disease patients (n = 75) were retrospectively selected from clinical records for having achieved remission within 6 months of receiving combined biological + immunosuppressive therapy. Treatment continued for a further year with one or the other of the combination drugs withdrawn. Clinical remission was defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) < 150 and endoscopic remission as CDAI < 150 + absence of mucosal lesions + no signs of active inflammation on ileocolonoscopy. Crohn's disease relapse was defined as CDAI > 250. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent (21/75) patients were relapsers. Withdrawal of biological therapy was more frequent than immunosuppressive (73.3% vs 26.7%) with no significant differences in relapse rates (30.9% vs 20%; P = 0.401). Endoscopic remission was more accurate than clinical remission (relapse rates: 10.5% vs 33.9%; P = 0.05). C-reactive-protein was higher in relapsers (19.2 ± 23.7 mg/L vs 2.5 ± 4.7 mg/L; P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis indicated C-reactive protein > 5 mg/L (odds ratios [OR]: 30.12; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 5.91-153.38; P = 0.0001) and younger age at diagnosis (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.19; P = .047) as independent factors predicting relapse. There was a strong trend toward a protective effect of endoscopic remission (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02-1.22; P = 0.077). CONCLUSION: A subgroup of Crohn's disease patients treated with combination therapy can be identified (C-reactive protein < 5 mg/L, endoscopic remission, and older age at Crohn's disease diagnosis) who would continue in remission despite cessation of the biological (expensive) component of the combination therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ampuero et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: