Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Fast tacrolimus-metabolizing kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) (i.e., tacrolimus trough-level/total daily dose [C0/D < 1.05]) have poorer allograft function; however, their identification in a real-life setting is challenging. We investigated the reproducibility of tacrolimus metabolic status during the first months after transplantation and its association with long-term allograft outcomes. Methods: All KTRs between 2000 and 2019 with a functional allograft at 1 month and receiving tacrolimus in our center were included. Fast or slow tacrolimus metabolizers were classified according to the time spent with a C0/D < 1.05 (> 75% = High, < 25% = Low) at various time points posttransplantation. We first determined the earliest accurate time for patient categorization by investigating C0/D variability during the first months. Second, a multivariate cause-specific Cox model studying allograft outcomes was performed in groups identified by their status determined from the earliest accurate timepoint after transplantation. Conclusion: C0/D is a simple and pragmatic tool capable of identifying patients at risk of rejection and allograft failure as early as the second month posttransplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masset et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: