Key result
Hysteresis-derived LVEDP measurement from a percutaneous ventricular assist device showed greater precision and correlation with actual pressures than traditional inferences via PCWP.
Why the study?
Does deriving LVEDP from the hysteretic operating metrics of a percutaneous ventricular assist device improve measurement precision and correlation with actual pressures compared to traditional PCWP inferences?
Does deriving LVEDP from the hysteretic operating metrics of a percutaneous ventricular assist device improve measurement precision and correlation with actual pressures compared to traditional PCWP inferences?
Deriving LVEDP from the hysteretic operating metrics of a percutaneous ventricular assist device provides a more precise and accurate measurement of cardiac function than traditional PCWP inferences.
May refine LVEDP assessment during pVAD support; leaves open translation to human hemodynamics and outcomes.
The full potential of mechanical circulatory systems in the treatment of cardiogenic shock is impeded by the lack of accurate measures of cardiac function to guide clinicians in determining when to initiate and how to optimally titrate support. The left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an established metric of cardiac function that refers to the pressure in the left ventricle at the end of ventricular filling and immediately before ventricular contraction. In clinical practice, LVEDP is typically only inferred from, and poorly correlates with, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). We leveraged the position of an indwelling percutaneous ventricular assist device and advanced data analysis methods to obtain LVEDP from the hysteretic operating metrics of the device. We validated our hysteresis-derived LVEDP measurement using mock flow loops, an animal model of cardiac dysfunction, and data from a patient in cardiogenic shock to show greater measurement precision and correlation with actual pressures than traditional inferences via PCWP. Delineation of the nonlinear relationship between device and heart adds insight into the interaction between ventricular support devices and the native heart, paving the way for continuous assessment of underlying cardiac state, metrics of cardiac function, potential closed-loop automated control, and rational design of future innovations in mechanical circulatory support systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2018) studied Cardiogenic shock (n=1). Hysteresis-derived LVEDP measurement vs. Traditional inferences via PCWP was evaluated on Measurement precision and correlation with actual pressures. Hysteresis-derived LVEDP measurement from a percutaneous ventricular assist device showed greater precision and correlation with actual pressures than traditional inferences via PCWP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: