Key result
Demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty using an activity-rest stimulation protocol improves NYHA class, ejection fraction, and survival, offering an economical alternative for circulatory bioassist.
Why the study?
Does demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty improve clinical outcomes in humans?
Does demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty improve clinical outcomes in humans?
Demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty using an activity-rest stimulation protocol may offer a viable, cost-effective circulatory bioassist alternative, particularly in developing countries.
Should not yet change heart failure practice; leaves open demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty as an economical bioassist pending prospective trials.
After the initial enthusiasm, the dynamic cardiomyoplasty lost its reputation owing to the poor long-term results, caused by the muscular degeneration subsequent to chronic continuous electrical stimulation of the latissimus dorsi. An activity-rest stimulation protocol that avoids full transformation of the skeletal muscle, maintaining muscular properties over time, has been successfully tried. This "demand" stimulation protocol showed in humans good results improving NYHA class, ejection fraction value, and survival. The discussion about the capability of this and a unique kind of cardiocirculatory bioassist is due to be reopened. In fact, heart transplant, percutaneous circulatory-supporting device, multisites stimulation therapy, and total artificial heart have some drawbacks, one of which is the economic cost. In developing countries the more economic demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty may still play a role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigatelli et al. (2003) conducted a review in Heart failure requiring circulatory bioassist. Demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty (activity-rest stimulation protocol) was evaluated. Demand dynamic cardiomyoplasty using an activity-rest stimulation protocol improves NYHA class, ejection fraction, and survival, offering an economical alternative for circulatory bioassist.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: