Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite the fact that acridine ( 1 ) and diphenylacetic acid ( a ) are achiral compounds, a chiral two-component molecular crystal ( 1·a ) in which two molecules are self-assembled in a 1:1 molar ratio by hydrogen bonding crystallizes spontaneously from an acetonitrile solution. The space group is P 2 1 2 1 2 1, which is typical chiral space group. Both handed crystals (−)- 1·a and (+)- 1·a can be prepared as desired on a large scale by seeding. The two phenyl planes and the carboxyl plane of the diphenylacetic acid molecule in the crystal (−)- 1·a have torsions in the same direction as the blades of a propeller. The oppositely handed crystal (+)- 1·a has minus torsion angles. Irradiation of (−)- 1·a or (+)- 1·a caused stereospecific decarboxylating condensation to give an excess of the chiral compound {(−)- 3 } or {(+)- 3 } in about 35% ee, respectively, as the main product. The absolute configurations of the reactant (−)- 1·a and the product (−)- 3 could be determined to be ( M )-(−)- 1·a and ( S )-(−)- 3 by the Bijvoet method based on anomalous dispersion of an oxygen atom of (−)- 1·a and a sulfur atom of the trifluoromethanesulfonate salt of methylated (−)- 3 during X-ray crystallographic analysis. Upon irradiating ( M )-(−)- 1·a, the diphenylmethyl radical and the hydroacridine radical are produced via electron transfer from a to 1 and subsequent proton transfer followed by decarboxylation. The next radical coupling occurs with the shortest distance of 5.1 Å between the two preradical carbon atoms in the crystal lattice to afford ( S )-(−)- 3 as the major enantiomer. On the other hand ( R )-(+)- 3 can be produced as the minor enantiomer by coupling over a longer distance of 6.8 Å, resulting in a ca. 2:1 of S:R ratio, i.e., about 35% ee. The radical coupling is necessarily accompanied by a slight movement of the radical species in the crystal lattice, in contrast to the well-known topochemical [2+2] photocycloaddition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koshima et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: