Key result
Chlorpromazine binds to the isolated PAS domain of EAG channels and inhibits currents from these channels in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 3.7 μM.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the intracellular N-terminal PAS domain can regulate EAG potassium channel function via ligand binding.
Effect estimate: IC50 3.7 μM
Chlorpromazine binds to the PAS domain of EAG channels and inhibits their currents, revealing a novel ligand-binding regulatory mechanism and suggesting potential repurposing for EAG-associated diseases.
Ligand binding to EAG PAS domain unconfirmed; leaves open whether this regulates channel function in excitability or cancer.
Ether-a-go-go (EAG) potassium selective channels are major regulators of neuronal excitability and cancer progression. EAG channels contain a Per–Arnt–Sim (PAS) domain in their intracellular N-terminal region. The PAS domain is structurally similar to the PAS domains in non-ion channel proteins, where these domains frequently function as ligand-binding domains. Despite the structural similarity, it is not known whether the PAS domain can regulate EAG channel function via ligand binding. Here, using surface plasmon resonance, tryptophan fluorescence, and analysis of EAG currents recorded in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we show that a small molecule chlorpromazine (CH), widely used as an antipsychotic medication, binds to the isolated PAS domain of EAG channels and inhibits currents from these channels. Mutant EAG channels that lack the PAS domain show significantly lower inhibition by CH, suggesting that CH affects currents from EAG channels directly through the binding to the PAS domain. Our study lends support to the hypothesis that there are previously unaccounted steps in EAG channel gating that could be activated by ligand binding to the PAS domain. This has broad implications for understanding gating mechanisms of EAG and related ERG and ELK K + channels and places the PAS domain as a new target for drug discovery in EAG and related channels. Up-regulation of EAG channel activity is linked to cancer and neurological disorders. Our study raises the possibility of repurposing the antipsychotic drug chlorpromazine for treatment of neurological disorders and cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied this question. Chlorpromazine vs. Control (absence of chlorpromazine) was evaluated on EAG channel current inhibition (IC50 3.7 μM). Chlorpromazine binds to the isolated PAS domain of EAG channels and inhibits currents from these channels in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 3.7 μM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: