Key result
Stress management training programs resulted in significant differences in cardiorespiratory efficiency during a submaximal run compared to the control group.
Why the study?
Do stress management training programs improve cardiorespiratory efficiency in male cross-country runners?
Do stress management training programs improve cardiorespiratory efficiency in male cross-country runners?
Stress management training programs may improve cardiorespiratory efficiency during submaximal exercise in male runners.
Should not change practice yet; leaves open benefits for cardiorespiratory efficiency in runners.
The effects of two stress management programs on the cardiorespiratory efficiency of eight male cross-country runners were investigated. Oxygen consumption and heart rate data were monitored on a maximal oxygen consumption tradmill run. A week later each subject completed a 20-min submaximal run (at a constant workload approximating 50% of each subject's maximal oxygen consumption run). Based on these scores, subjects were divided into three groups: control, stress innoculation training, and stress management training. Subjects in both training groups completed a mental training program including EMG relaxation training, cognitive coping strategies, and one type of imagery training. Results of the 20-min post submaximal run indicated significant differences in cardiorespiratory efficiency between both training groups and the control group. No differences emerged between the training groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziegler et al. (1982) studied Healthy cross-country runners (n=8). Stress management training programs (stress inoculation training and stress management training) vs. Control was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory efficiency (oxygen consumption and heart rate during a 20-min submaximal run). Stress management training programs resulted in significant differences in cardiorespiratory efficiency during a submaximal run compared to the control group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: