Key result
Sarpogrelate at 200 mg bid or tid did not significantly increase absolute claudication distance at 24 weeks compared to placebo (p=0.225 and p=0.580, respectively).
Why the study?
Does sarpogrelate improve absolute claudication distance in patients with stable, moderately severe intermittent claudication?
RCT (n=364)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does sarpogrelate improve absolute claudication distance in patients with stable, moderately severe intermittent claudication?
Sarpogrelate did not significantly improve absolute claudication distance at 24 weeks compared to placebo in patients with intermittent claudication, though responder analyses suggest potential benefit.
This was a multinational, multicentre, double-blind Phase II study in Europe to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens (200 mg bid and 200 mg tid) of sarpogrelate (MCI-9042, 5-HT2A receptor antagonist) compared to placebo in patients with stable, moderately severe intermittent claudication. Following a single-blind placebo run-in period of 6 weeks, 364 (309 male and 55 female) patients (59.2 +/- 8.4 years, mean +/- SD) were randomized to receive sarpogrelate 200 mg bid, 200 mg tid or placebo for 24 weeks with a follow-up of 8 weeks. The primary objective was the increase of absolute claudication distance (ACD) at the end of treatment (week 24) compared to placebo. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed on the log-transformed percentage of baseline ACD: loge(ACD/baseline). A responder analysis (defined as a > or = 50% improvement in ACD) was also performed. There was a marked training/placebo effect on the ACD which persisted up to 16 weeks. At 24 weeks the primary objective did not reach statistical significance (200mg bid vs placebo, p = 0.225; 200mg tid vs placebo, p = 0.580). In the responder analysis, 200 mg bid showed a statistically significant difference vs placebo (p = 0.035). In the exploratory analysis with completers (patients completing all treadmill tests), there was a statistical difference in ACD/baseline change for 200 mg bid (p = 0.035) and in the responder analysis for 200 mg tid (p = 0.044) at 24 weeks compared to placebo. Both treatments showed a carry-over effect for ACD during the 8-week follow-up (weeks 28-32). The treatment was well tolerated and no clinically significant safety concerns were reported. In conclusion, the study results confirm that sarpogrelate is well tolerated and although the primary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance, the responder analysis showed an increased absolute walking distance, which makes a further trial warranted, including a larger population, and possibly also a longer treatment period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norgren et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Stable, moderately severe intermittent claudication (n=364). Sarpogrelate vs. Placebo was evaluated on Increase of absolute claudication distance (ACD) at the end of treatment (week 24) (p=0.225 (200mg bid); 0.580 (200mg tid)). Sarpogrelate at 200 mg bid or tid did not significantly increase absolute claudication distance at 24 weeks compared to placebo (p=0.225 and p=0.580, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: