Solutions of supercritical CO 2 modified with 5, 10, and 20% methanol, ethanol, acetone, and acetonitrile were compared for the extraction of sulfonamides from fortified chicken liver. The results showed both 20% acetone-modified CO 2 and 20% acetonitrile-modified CO 2 were capable of quantitatively extracting sulfamethazine, sulfaquinoxaline, and sulfadimethoxine, whereas 20% ethanol- and 20% methanol-modified CO 2 were found to be less efficient. Acetonitrile-modified CO 2 however, produced fewer chromatographic interferences than acetone, making quantitation easier. Sub-ppm levels of the three analytes were shown to be quantitatively extracted from chicken liver with 20% acetonitrile modifier. Also, quantitative recovery was obtained with spiked beef liver samples employing 20% acetone modifier, and greater than 90% recovery was obtained for two of the three with 20% acetonitrile-modified CO 2, while either 20% acetone- or 20% acetonitrile-modified CO 2 was found to yield quantitative recovery from egg yolk. In contrast to conventional sample preparation procedures no sample cleanup prior to quantitative analysis was required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Combs et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: